Newton’s Third Law (revised):
“For every half halt there must be equal or greater leg.”
My Awesome Rider Friend coined this axiom a while ago, but it’s been especially applicable the last two weeks. Surya and I spent the time after Show #2 building a pretty picture, which culminated in Show #3. Then, over the course of three lessons, we took everything apart, scattered the pieces around, and I threw a tantrum in my mind (and okay, out loud a bit) about how I sucked as a rider and our schooling was incorrect.
INCORRECT!
It started during a dressage lesson, two days after the show. In working on getting Surya more supple and in steadier contact with the bridle, my trainer gave me a very simple instruction while we were trotting to the left on a 20-meter circle. “Stop using an indirect inside rein. Use an opening rein.” Surya immediately turned left into the circle. I opened the right rein, brought the left rein back to her neck, and nudged her over with my left leg. This was not the response my trainer was looking for, from me or Surya, and not the reaction I was expecting from Surya. I strengthened the pressure from my inside leg and opened the inside rein a little. She braced against my leg, curved her body to the right, and decreased the radius of the circle. My immediate reaction was to use an indirect inside rein to get her “back on the bit” and on the correct size circle. And that was when it all fell apart and we realized that the pretty picture I was working on was smoke and mirrors.
I knew for a while that Surya tended to lean on the inside rein, indicating that she was falling in on her inside shoulder. But this was not the true problem. The true problem is that she was never really submitting, never bending around my inside leg. Rather, I was using an indirect rein to bend her poll while she braced against the inside leg and rein. I exaggerate slightly. If the problem was obvious, my trainer would have stopped us long ago. We were going well enough to have adjustability, steering, and contact in the trot and canter. My trainer told me a few months ago to stop using a big (emphasis on “big”) opening rein until we gained control over Surya’s hindquarters and shoulders. Surya now travels straight, but I over-interpreted the ban on opening rein and instead developed an indirect rein addiction. The result was Surya and me drawing circles of decreasing diameter while she accelerated in stress. My trainer put an immediate and absolute moratorium on indirect reins, and proceeded to spend the rest of my lesson telling me, repeatedly, as I needed constant reminding, to open the inside rein and use my inside leg. It did not go well.
As in half halts, the legs are more important than the hands. The impulsion, direction, and bend must come from the legs through to the hands. Laugh at my cluelessness if you want, but I finally understood what the hell people mean by that. The reins are used to define the direction of the bend, to increase submission, as backup to the leg, and as an emergency break. If the reins are the main (mane) event, you are riding from the front of the horse. As my ARF recently discovered in her own riding struggles and said in exasperation, “In dressage, everything must go back!”
I was released from the lesson on Tuesday with the mandate to work on bending Surya around my inside leg with an opening rein. Ortogocryinacornerjustkidding. This went terribly for a few days, and then it was time for our jump lesson. Which, spoiler alert, went terribly.
After the success of the show, my trainer had us work on cantering jumps.
Here is a list of things I don’t do:
1. Anticipate the jump and throw my upper body forward before Surya takes off. Hooray! (this is because I cannot see a distance to save my life, have no idea when she is going to leave the ground, and so just react when she jumps)
2. See a distance. (see above)
3. Hit her in the mouth upon landing.
4. Help.
Here is a list of things I do:
1. Steer. (I am actually pretty good at this)
2. Swing my lower legs really far back, especially when going over a jump and landing. (this means I don’t land in my heels)
3. Land on my hands, on Surya’s neck. (because my legs are still behind the jump and I therefore cannot use them)
4. Suck at jumping.
According to both my trainer and my ARF, part of the reason my lower leg swings back is because the saddle I am using (an old one borrowed from ARF) is awful and it encourages me to do so. The other reason is because I am terrible at jumping.
Until this week, I didn’t even understand what I was supposed to be doing mechanically. I understood what was supposed to happen as we were going up, and then over, but I was completely lost on the down part. My trainer kept telling me to just sit up as the horse goes down, but for whatever reason that was still mystifying. Sit up?! When?! To what degree?! At what exact point in time?! Is my back supposed to be arched? Curved? Flat? Are my heels and lower leg in front of me? Should I look exactly the same as if the horse is flat, except titled at an angle?
My trainer finally gave me a concrete image that somehow made it all better last Tuesday. “Keep your upper body parallel to the horse’s neck.” And then I added Sally Swift’s maxim to keep your feet under your center of gravity. Obviously this doesn’t work if the horse doesn’t have good form or is jumping high enough to bascule beneath its knees, but Surya is such a Mary Sue at the height we are jumping that the imagery works. I resolved to imagine this happening in my head until it happens naturally IRL. So. There’s that.
Meanwhile, in dressage land, we had another lesson, and confirmed that we still were not getting it (biiiig surprise there). My trainer suggested that perhaps she should ride Surya to give her the right idea if the next lesson does not go well. At this point, after three lessons of disaster, I was feeling like dismounting and punching the wall. It was not so much that things were not going right. After all, we LITERALLY ran into a wall the first few times we tried to canter to the right. It was more the fact that our (my) inability to execute dressage movements felt like a regression. It’s easier to shrug about the jumping. I haven’t put in the work to be good at it yet. But I have higher expectations in dressage.
Oh well. Back to basics. After another rough couple of rides, I think Soy Bean (Surya’s nickname to her barn name when I am happy with her) and I are communicating better. I think things are starting to click again. She moved off my inside leg and bent with the inside rein instead of turning. But she still continually tried to turn to the inside, and I constantly struggled to keep my hips angled along the curve of the circle instead of twisting them to the outside to keep her from turning in. Something was missing. The key “aha!” moment came after I went back and re-read Philippe Karl’s book Twisted Truths of Modern Dressage. Despite the off-putting title, the book is a gem of discussion of riding and training technique. My favorite chapter discusses weight.
I spent many years as a child in ballet being yelled at by my mother to stand up straight, many years as an adult practicing yoga, and the last year being told by my trainer to sit up straight, tuck my pelvis under, and stop collapsing my right side. While I am certainly not perfect, I feel confident enough to say I do not slump in the saddle or lean significantly to one side or the other. However, I do weight one side more than the other.
Philippe Karl discusses how a person’s weight placement affects a horse. Imagine standing facing a wall with another person on your shoulders. The person on your shoulder leans to the right. Do you step left or right to stay underneath them? Right. You stepped into their weight. Now imagine you are holding a heavy suitcase in your right hand, and you are trying to go faster to get to your train. Do you skip with the left leg or the right leg? Left. It’s easier; there’s nothing inhibiting the movement. So, if I want Soy Bean to stay on the outside of a circle while bending to the inside, weight the outside slightly. This also gives her more freedom of movement on the inside.
While Karl does not specifically mention this (probably because he is way too awesome for such obvious instructions), I think it particularly important to note that I try not to weight one side or the other by leaning. Rather, imagine standing up very straight, then lifting up your left foot. Technically, you are now weighting the right even though you are still standing straight. I’m really not quite sure I’m doing this right, since Karl is too much of a horse riding god to dispense such minutiae, but I think I have the general idea.
When I started working on canter with Surya, I paid very close attention to my weight. Since we started consistently getting the correct lead, I let my attention lapse. After re-reading Karl’s snarky proselytizing, I paid attention to my weight again at the trot, and realized that I’d been weighting the inside! I was telling Soy Bean to turn in, and brace against the inside. I shifted my weight to the outside, and all of a sudden BAM! We were trotting in flexed steady bendy circles. Combined with opening reins and better leg yielding, I think I have something.
Things I am unsure of:
1. If this success is repeatable, and as much of a break-through as I think it is. We will find out today in our lesson.
2. If I’m actually weighting the outside, or merely am finally balanced and no longer weighting the inside. How can anyone tell? The difference is not exactly super visible.
3. Apple versus pumpkin pie. If Ryan Gosling would just endorse one or the other…
The past few days I’ve been thinking a lot about the following: a horse is expected to bend into an inside leg, but travel away from an outside leg. The difference between the two is monumental, and key to my current struggle. I think in more advanced training it’s the same concept as the difference between a half-pass and a leg yield.